The applicant provided some evidence with their application of their personal and economic circumstances in support of their claims to be a genuine tourist who intends a temporary stay.
Although the applicant claimed to be employed in Vietnam with family’s restaurant, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence with the application of a regular salary payment/revenue that supports the applicant’s income and employment claims. This leads me to have doubts as to the applicant’s ongoing employment and overall economic circumstances in Vietnam. As such, I do not consider that the applicant has strong employment or economic incentives to return Vietnam at the end of the applicant’s proposed stay in Australia.
I have considered the evidence provided of the applicant’s economic circumstances as a whole, and note that the evidence provided of the applicant’s financial capacity is a recently deposited bank deposit. I have attached little weight to this document as evidence of the applicant’s financial means, as on its own, it does not sufficiently demonstrate any regular income or savings pattern and cannot be considered as significant evidence of the applicant’s overall financial situation. I am also not satisfied that the applicant has the ability to accumulate the funds presented, and therefore that these are the personal funds of the applicant. As such, I do not consider that the applicant has strong economic incentives to return Vietnam at the end of the applicant’s proposed stay in Australia.
I note that the application includes details that support for the applicant will be provided by a third party. While I have taken the offer of support into consideration, I have attached less weight to this evidence as this is not in of itself sufficient evidence of a genuine visit. The onus is on the applicant themselves to provide evidence of their circumstances in Vietnam that would demonstrate that they intend a genuine temporary visit.
I also note from the details and evidence provided in the application, that the applicant has limited previous international travel. While considering all of the details provided in the application, I find that the limited previous international travel undertaken by the applicant, and the applicant’s personal circumstances to be inconsistent with the stated purpose and length of the applicant’s proposed visit.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in the applicant’s visa application form and the supporting documents provided. On balance, I find that the applicant has not demonstrated sufficiently strong employment, economic, family or other commitments in Vietnam that would be sufficient incentive for the applicant to return to Vietnam.
In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that the applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose the applicant has stated, and therefore find that the applicant does not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Regulations.
Decision
As the applicant did not meet one or more subclauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that the applicant does not meet the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (class FA) (subclass 600) visa. Therefore, I refuse the application for a Visitor visa.
Mình bị từ chối visa có thể nộp lại đc k vậy..cảm ơn các bạn nhiều
